(September 4, 2013 at 11:31 am)Chas Wrote: "However he chooses and whichever he chooses, that's a choice he cannot escape. And that gives the moral dimension to his actions. That forms the basis on which his actions can be considered moral or immoral."
How is it moral or immoral? By what standard?
You mean how he chooses his morality? That choice is amoral. And as indicated by the existence of so many different moralities - there isn't a fixed standard, yet.
(September 4, 2013 at 11:31 am)Chas Wrote: So the solitary person's 'morality' is entirely functional?
All morality is entirely functional.