RE: Blind faith and evolution
September 14, 2013 at 12:37 pm
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2013 at 12:42 pm by Whateverist.)
(September 14, 2013 at 12:26 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Rico, I think you've pretty much established by now that you wouldn't be able to tell philosophy from philology, philately or Phil the Fluter.
But if he is any good at all with yoga perhaps he can give a decent account of autofellatery.
(July 17, 2013 at 10:53 am)Chuck Wrote:(July 17, 2013 at 10:26 am)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Is there a point to this?
Yes. He wanted to prove blind chance could never give him coherence, much less soundness or validity.
You may be on to something. He may in the end prove the infinite monkey theorem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem