RE: Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View
January 17, 2010 at 4:46 pm
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2010 at 4:54 pm by fr0d0.)
You crazy diamond Evie 
And what's with the new "evinice" word??
Say you had a sand pit with an impression in it, and the object that made the impression was missing. In this instance, couldn't you know or have a good idea of what made the impression without it actually being there? We're not talking about 'evidencing' something anyway. We're talking about working out 'something' of the entity in question.
Do you think there are things we can call "not God" Evie? Do you agree this is possible?
You're such a shit Rabbit. Nice mindless rep too VOID.
I'm not volunteering my interpretation as that's not relevant here. You are free to make up your own metaphysical diversion. With VOID it's future technology. With you it's your own flavour of spirituality.
You know very well what we're talking about here, yet you volunteer this dog shit for opinion. Be a sweetie and clear up after yourself.

And what's with the new "evinice" word??

Say you had a sand pit with an impression in it, and the object that made the impression was missing. In this instance, couldn't you know or have a good idea of what made the impression without it actually being there? We're not talking about 'evidencing' something anyway. We're talking about working out 'something' of the entity in question.
Do you think there are things we can call "not God" Evie? Do you agree this is possible?
(January 17, 2010 at 4:37 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: This is not about making clear to others what god is, but this is the Way of the Dodger. fr0d0 evidently more than anything cherishes the elusiveness of his personal god and is prepared to sacrifice logic for it. The god of fr0d0 is not tangible, not detectable, not provable, not verifiable, not falsifiable. Belief without any evidence or clue whatsoever is random and meaningless yet this is what he's trying to sell. My guess is that fr0d0 himself does not believe in a god since he cannot name one characteristic feature that defines him. It's a classic case of holding on to a dream in spite of knowing better. A strange battle between hope and reason.
You're such a shit Rabbit. Nice mindless rep too VOID.
I'm not volunteering my interpretation as that's not relevant here. You are free to make up your own metaphysical diversion. With VOID it's future technology. With you it's your own flavour of spirituality.
You know very well what we're talking about here, yet you volunteer this dog shit for opinion. Be a sweetie and clear up after yourself.