Posts: 4
Threads: 1
Joined:
Today
Reputation:
0
proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
2 hours ago
(⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})
read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"
What do you think of this ontological proof?
Posts: 52461
Threads: 566
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
2 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 2 hours ago by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(2 hours ago)atheistgod Wrote: (⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})
read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"
What do you think of this ontological proof?
I think you need either a hobby or a girlfriend. Possibly both.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 21231
Threads: 482
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
31
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)atheistgod Wrote: (⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})
read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"
What do you think of this ontological proof?
I think you've been watching the movie Sound of Music way too many times
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 35293
Threads: 1439
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
1 hour ago
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Posts: 3878
Threads: 31
Joined: August 9, 2015
Reputation:
27
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
49 minutes ago
My rebuttle;
(╯°□°)╯ ︵ ┻━┻
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)
Posts: 52461
Threads: 566
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
35 minutes ago
(1 hour ago)atheistgod Wrote: (2 hours ago)Angrboda Wrote:
Don't quit your day job.
nice song lol;
I don't work for anyone. Too many inventions to patent.
Name one.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax