Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 8, 2026, 7:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
#1
proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})

read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"



What do you think of this ontological proof?
Reply
#2
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(2 hours ago)atheistgod Wrote: (⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})

read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"



What do you think of this ontological proof?

I think you need either a hobby or a girlfriend. Possibly both.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#3
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(2 hours ago)atheistgod Wrote: (⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})

read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"



What do you think of this ontological proof?

I think you've been watching the movie Sound of Music way too many times



teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply
#4
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing




Don't quit your day job.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
#5
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(2 hours ago)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I think you need either a hobby or a girlfriend. Possibly both.

Boru

hobby; inventor scientism logician hypnotist


girlfriend; nice yummy tits
Reply
#6
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(2 hours ago)Fake Messiah Wrote: I think you've been watching the movie Sound of Music way too many times




nothing comes from nothing, nothing never could



do you believe something can come from nothing?
Reply
#7
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(2 hours ago)Angrboda Wrote:



Don't quit your day job.

nice song lol;


I don't work for anyone. Too many inventions to patent.
Reply
#8
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
[Image: 156fd3ad4b35632c06ceb0c75f58149c.gif]
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Reply
#9
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
My rebuttle;

(╯°□°)╯ ︵ ┻━┻
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

   
  Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg][Image: shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcSBjdQ4tzp0y16OBYXxG...s&usqp=CAc]
                                                                                         
Reply
#10
RE: proof of ontology starting from assuming nothing
(1 hour ago)atheistgod Wrote:
(2 hours ago)Angrboda Wrote:



Don't quit your day job.

nice song lol;


I don't work for anyone. Too many inventions to patent.

Name one.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Everything, Something's or Nothing Lord Andreasson 28 7700 October 4, 2024 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 16305 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  [Serious] Criticism of Aquinas' First Way or of the Proof of God from Motion. spirit-salamander 75 21250 May 3, 2021 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  A 'proof' of God's existence - free will mrj 54 18118 August 9, 2020 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Sal
  Proof that I'm immortal Shantideva 64 15976 September 11, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Something from Nothing Banned 66 25463 March 7, 2018 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  An easy proof that rational numbers are countable. Jehanne 7 4206 February 22, 2018 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Everything is nothing, and nothing is everything. goombah111 64 21939 January 3, 2017 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: goombah111
  Devil's advocate for why ontology is meaningless and vacuous. Edwardo Piet 76 19451 September 12, 2016 at 3:48 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Who Has the Burden of Proof? Rhondazvous 10 5610 October 26, 2015 at 10:49 pm
Last Post: jenny1972



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)