(September 21, 2013 at 9:08 am)Rationalman Wrote:(September 21, 2013 at 8:36 am)enrico Wrote: When two people go in front of a judge without any hard evidence the judge will decide according to logic and according to what make more sense.
Wrong, if there was no hard evidence, it wouldn't go to court. Even if it did go to court, the judge would be unable to convict anyone due to lack of evidence.
(September 21, 2013 at 8:36 am)enrico Wrote: What you got to disprove me apart your usual swearing?
NOTHING.
Its impossible to disprove something which has not been proven to start with.
Evidence is a tricky word if you consider the situation within this physical universe.The evidence that is valid right now will end up in the dust bin of history tomorrow or even sooner.
When you live in a moving and changing situation where the positive and negative balance each other there is no way that the things stay the same so the evidence is quite illusory.
Has been already proven that progress can not exist in the physical and mental arena because as soon as you gain on one side you loose on the other.
On the contrary within the spiritual arena where the positive is not affected by the negative because there is no negative is possible to gain progress so permanent evidence is possible.
In this way is possible to understand what is the truth and what is not.
