RE: Watch
September 22, 2013 at 2:15 pm
(This post was last modified: September 22, 2013 at 2:17 pm by Captain Colostomy.)
(September 22, 2013 at 1:56 pm)pocaracas Wrote:
Can I join the party??
(September 22, 2013 at 11:08 am)yoleeena Wrote: I dont think youve watched the video, the poet points out all the faultsI didn't watch it, but I can guess what's in it from all your replies.
0+0 will ALWAYS ALWAYS give you nothing but ZERO, therefore nothing comes from nothing
But you guys dont get it...
0 + 0 = 0, always.... but,... now here's an eye opener, 1-1 = 0, too..... 1E20 - 1E20 = 0
Ever heard of anti-matter?
Ever heard of PET scan? You know what that 'P' stands for?
As for the something from "nothing", here's how the (not so) state of the art quantum theory is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particles
Quote:In physics, a virtual particle is a transient fluctuation that exhibits many of the characteristics of an ordinary particle, but that exists for a limited time. The concept of virtual particles arises in perturbation theory of quantum field theory where interactions between ordinary particles are described in terms of exchanges of virtual particles. Any process involving virtual particles admits a schematic representation known as a Feynman diagram, in which virtual particles are represented by internal lines. [1][2]
Virtual particles do not necessarily carry the same mass as the corresponding real particle, although they always conserve energy and momentum. The longer the virtual particle exists, the closer its characteristics come to those of ordinary particles. Virtual particles may be thought of as arising due to the time-energy uncertainty principle.[3][4] They are important in the physics of many processes, including particle scattering and Casimir forces. In quantum field theory, even classical forces — such as the electromagnetic repulsion or attraction between two charges — can be thought of as due to the exchange of many virtual photons between the charges.
The term is somewhat loose and vaguely defined, in that it refers to the view that the world is made up of "real particles": it is not; rather, "real particles" are better understood to be excitations of the underlying quantum fields. Virtual particles are also excitations of the underlying fields, but are "temporary" in the sense that they appear in calculations of interactions, but never as asymptotic states or indices to the scattering matrix. As such the accuracy and use of virtual particles in calculations is firmly established, but their "reality" or existence is a question of philosophy rather than science.
Antiparticles have been proven to exist and should not be confused with virtual particles or virtual antiparticles.
[...]
Manifestations:
- Coulomb force: caused by the exchange of virtual photons
- magnetic field: caused by the exchange of virtual photons
- Virtual photons are also a major component of antenna near field phenomena and induction fields
- strong nuclear force between quarks is the result of interaction of virtual gluons.
- weak nuclear force - it is the result of exchange by virtual W and Z bosons.
- Casimir effect
- van der Waals force, which is partly due to the Casimir effect between two atoms.
- Vacuum polarization, which involves pair production or the decay of the vacuum, which is the spontaneous production of particle-antiparticle pairs
- Hawking radiation, where the gravitational field is so strong that it causes the spontaneous production of photon pairs (with black body energy distribution) and even of particle pairs.
There you have a bunch of tested (and testable) examples of real phenomena which happens due to the "nothing" which virtual particles are.
Now imagine a particle/anti-particle pair production that happens a lot in a very limited space.... new Universe!
It's a possibility.
We don't know exactly what happened, but it sure seems feasible.
You may as well have wrote this in a dead language(like Portuguese! :p), for all she'll understand of it.