(October 5, 2013 at 7:46 pm)Rational AKD Wrote: that doesn't logically follow. even if you were correct that a 'certain amount of truth is' that doesn't mean any of our reasoning skills aren't compromised, yet alone all of them as you claim.
Actually, it does. Given that certain amount of truth is necessary for survival and any compromise of all of our reasoning skills would compromise our ability to discern that truth, then it means our survival would be compromised. It isn't, so they aren't.
(October 5, 2013 at 7:46 pm)Rational AKD Wrote: why? why do you think any of our reasoning skills are tailored for discerning truth instead of being adjusted to benefit our survival skills? and even if some of them are adjusted for indicating truth, how can you say all of them are?
Because discerning truth is a survival skill.