The MA is definitely a contender for the stupidest thing apologists have ever said, a truly competitive field. 
"Solve meta-ethics or God exists!"
But Gen, an apologist would just respond that the objective moral standard is God's nature, wouldn't they?
I remember Craig (in his debate with Sam Harris) was challenged by an audience member about something related to the fact/value distinction and Craig's response was like "Our duties are constituted by commands from a competent authority, that is to say, by imperatives issued by the Good itself."
Oh boy, Christianity thieving from Platonism again! Didn't see that coming...

"Solve meta-ethics or God exists!"
But Gen, an apologist would just respond that the objective moral standard is God's nature, wouldn't they?
I remember Craig (in his debate with Sam Harris) was challenged by an audience member about something related to the fact/value distinction and Craig's response was like "Our duties are constituted by commands from a competent authority, that is to say, by imperatives issued by the Good itself."
Oh boy, Christianity thieving from Platonism again! Didn't see that coming...


