(October 25, 2013 at 7:02 pm)Owlix Wrote:(October 25, 2013 at 6:36 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote: @Zazzy,
I made the model with a relatively thin veneer. The tells are actually necessarily given within the scenario frames. The only fair clues I could give without potentially tarnishing the purity of participant's responses, is that some who have already responded have hit on one of three key features within the frames. Even your most recent response (this latest one) contains extremely valuable data which will be added to the calculated results. As far as posting any results, I'm afraid that they would be far too anti-climactic for most of the members here, as they pertain to my work/study in the field of behavioral and cognitive psychology. No one here is being examined as an individual - I am examining a group, and attempting to interpret that group within the frame of a subjective model.
But you ARE going to tell us your overall objective, yes?
Revealing more at this stage would bias the results. I am at a point where calculations are being made based upon all input (seemingly relevant or otherwise). If you can imagine that this exercise is about something other than it appears, then you will be making good use of the time. Trust me, the model is constructed for a project that has no impact upon this forum. However, the forum input has tremendous impact upon the project. Just know that I will reveal the impetus for this exercise once enough data has been assembled, and that most of you will be very disinterested in the results.
