RE: Russell Brand vs. Paxman!
October 26, 2013 at 7:36 am
(October 25, 2013 at 10:27 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: Yes you are dumb for not voting. It gives you power to participate, no matter how you may chose to participate. You might aswell paint a swastiker on your ballot or smear your feces on it before dropping it in the box.
At least that is a statement, and that is better than no statement at all.
Yes, that would be a statement. A puerile one statement that would say far more about a person's maturity than their political inclinations.
Quote:Oh yes, you goverment is flawed, which does not mean that every single fucking goverment on this globe is flawed. You are not the center of this world.
I'll happily admit that I'm not aware of every single political system. Do you have an example of a flawless system of government?
Quote:Are you seriously saying that you never actualy looked into the goverment and legal structures of a country other than yours?
The question was rhetorical. Inflection doesn't get communicated very well in text.
Quote:In politics one only knows if one is right or wrong after looking at the success or shambles of what you had constructed and believed to be right.
That being the case, would it not be advantageous for the people making policies to be those best suited to the task? If I want my car fixed, I go to a mechanic. If I'm ill, I seek out a doctor (or just man the fuck up). So why would I want a failed journalist to dictate economic policy? Or a lawyer to make the important decisions on education?
Quote:Your system would require there to be obvious truths and a concept of social perfection.
Would it? I don't see why.
(October 25, 2013 at 10:40 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: (October 25, 2013 at 10:35 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote: Er, assertions are fun. England isn't a theocracy. In terms of real power, their Parliament is 'king'.
On paper. It is not.
Which means precisely fuck all.