(October 26, 2013 at 9:35 pm)Zazzy Wrote:@Zazzy,(October 26, 2013 at 9:30 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote: I would have loved a bigger sample set, but I have run this model on classes of dozens of students with varying detractors and qualifiers while sustaining the model format. The result is always nearly the same. Groups that "disagree" with one another disagree for reasons other than thoes that seem apparently obvious. THANK YOU for participating!Can you elaborate on what I bolded? I am interested in these results, so I'd love to know in what context they wander (if you are suggesting they wander. It may be you are merely showing full discovery of a statistical blip).
The results in the "nearly the same" category have been compiled over many years of research and testing. This exercise supports it's model, and NOT vice-versa. The variance in resulting data IS NOT restrained by the frames suggested in this model. This was a micro-study of a limited cross-section, and I for one, am pleased with the results of the exercise. The fruit I share with the rest of you is that the study indicates that our beliefs do not dictate our differences, but rather, our differences dictate beliefs.
