Your nagging is akin to trolling TW. Please be patient.
Well you arrive at conclusions by weighing up conflicting information right? To test your conclusions you seek out contradictory ideas to see if your current conclusions stand firm. If they don't, you change your mind and adopt the more rational position. i don't know how it's possible not to. Could any person lie to themselves to the extent they would 'be' something contrary to their logical conclusions? I can't see how.
(January 28, 2010 at 9:11 pm)TruthWorthy Wrote: How do you test something through rationalisation?
Well you arrive at conclusions by weighing up conflicting information right? To test your conclusions you seek out contradictory ideas to see if your current conclusions stand firm. If they don't, you change your mind and adopt the more rational position. i don't know how it's possible not to. Could any person lie to themselves to the extent they would 'be' something contrary to their logical conclusions? I can't see how.
