It wasn't an irrational snub is what is central to the problem. I'll PM you in kind, the irrationality of my question was to show indeed the irrationality of your reasoning. I know there's no way to test theory through rationalisation. That would be magical thinking - my point is that in other threads you say there's evidence if you come from the point of view that there is a god.
So where's the evidence, and how the hell can it be tested, regardless of whether you believe or not?
I recognise that understanding is easier from a point of belief; no secret there; but there's no substance in saying there is evidence in a perspective, in rationalisation. It's just preposterous.
So where's the evidence, and how the hell can it be tested, regardless of whether you believe or not?
I recognise that understanding is easier from a point of belief; no secret there; but there's no substance in saying there is evidence in a perspective, in rationalisation. It's just preposterous.
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.
