Ok, I'm not taking the piss out of you here, instead think of it as an example of being shown something you might not have seen before ok?
(January 29, 2010 at 5:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:I'm only focusing on the italisized text here, the rest has already been covered. I suppose you can either admit fault, deny as a typo or some other playing the game excuse, or take a new position as you did last time and pretend it didn't happen and then say you don't know what I meant.(January 28, 2010 at 9:11 pm)TruthWorthy Wrote: How do you test something through rationalisation?; [leading the witness]
Well you arrive at conclusions by weighing up conflicting information right? To test your conclusions you seek out contradictory ideas to see if your current conclusions stand firm. If they don't, you change your mind and adopt the more rational position. i don't know how it's possible not to. Could any person lie to themselves to the extent they would 'be' something contrary to their logical conclusions? I can't see how.
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.