RE: Christian motivations for joining AF
January 31, 2010 at 9:02 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2010 at 9:12 pm by fr0d0.)
What's the problem with that? Currently I stand by it. Please explain.
The point of my response to your objection to that statement last time, was that this isn't validate-able as scientific theories are:
My answer to you back then:
...was an example of how this isn't scientific theory where validatable evidence leads to a position of validated fact. There's nothing ever that can be validated.
I wonder if you can now continue and answer the reply I already gave you on this?
The point of my response to your objection to that statement last time, was that this isn't validate-able as scientific theories are:
TruthWorthy Wrote:Obtaining contradictory argument while attempting to validate any theory is not testing. Often the contradictory arguments against a theory are the results of other's actual tests and not based on subjective reasoning what so ever; the inference is in the data collected and is always presented as so.
My answer to you back then:
Quote:We've reached a conclusion: Thoughts exist physically in themselves. We constantly question that conclusion and consider, as openly as we can, alternate solutions. Should another solution present itself that makes more sense logically, we will abandon our initial conclusion and adopt a new one. We mustn't fall back on our first conclusion as if there were no other possible explanation.
...was an example of how this isn't scientific theory where validatable evidence leads to a position of validated fact. There's nothing ever that can be validated.
I wonder if you can now continue and answer the reply I already gave you on this?
