Christian motivations for joining AF

[TruthWorthy]

No, I don't disagree with your response here (above):

---

What's the problem with that? Currently I stand by it. Please explain.

The point of my response to your objection to that statement last time, was that this isn't validate-able as scientific theories are:

Obtaining contradictory argument while attempting to validate any theory is not testing. Often the contradictory arguments against a theory are the results of other's actual tests and not based on subjective reasoning what so ever; the inference is in the data collected and is always presented as so.

My answer to you back then:

We've reached a conclusion: Thoughts exist physically in themselves. We constantly question that conclusion and consider, as openly as we can, alternate solutions. Should another solution present itself that makes more sense logically, we will abandon our initial conclusion and adopt a new one. We mustn't fall back on our first conclusion as if there were no other possible explanation.

...was an example of how this isn't scientific theory where validatable evidence leads to a position of validated fact. There's nothing ever that can be validated.

I wonder if you can now continue and answer the reply I already gave you on this?

---

There are some minor details which should be addressed here, since some of the argument seems not to correspond with the content.
You use the word test instead of compare, etc. Tests aren't performed through rationalisation, you learn through tests but you hypothesize through mental functions.
Something else which isn't consistent in what you assert, that belief contributes to evidence, completely contradictory to your agreement of thoughts only pertaining within their own properties.