(November 14, 2013 at 9:45 pm)Ryantology Wrote:(November 14, 2013 at 7:45 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I'm quietly wondering to myself just how many times GC needs to post the same insulting non-answer before he runs afoul of our spamming or flaming rules.
Because, let's be clear here: this is not an answer with content. It's not an answer at all, and GC rarely posts anything of substance anymore.
I would not object to making it a requirement that the theist has to explicitly cite verses instead of just saying something vague and telling us "It's in the bible, look it up". We can even call it "The Lion IRC Rule", after the dishonest chickenshit who will forever be associated with this particular activity in my mind.
But in order to be fair, you'd have to require everyone to provide citations and explain why they are relevant, for every assertion. You can't just pick on the theists.
I don't like it. It would make posting far too laborious. Hell, it would make reading posts too laborious.
