RE: New Levels of Low
November 15, 2013 at 6:42 pm
(This post was last modified: November 15, 2013 at 6:44 pm by Lion IRC.)
(November 15, 2013 at 2:15 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(November 8, 2013 at 7:00 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Science doesn't lead to eugenics.
Atheist humanism does!
Yeah, forced sterilization is promoted by this tenet of humanism:
"All human beings are entitled to inalienable human rights such as those enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights."
Or maybe these humanist ethical rules:
"Abstaining from conduct injurious to life and the physical well-being of persons.
Abstaining from the theft of property of others
Abstaining from sexual violence and misconduct
Abstaining from falsehood, fraud and deception"
But personally I don't see anything there that justifies saying something so moronic, especially considering how much more religious the USA was when eugenics was popular than it is now.
All the above hinge on the definition of a human being.
Who sets the definition? The pro-lifers or the abortion on-demand folk?
Did you know some people have abortions when they find out their baby has Downs Syndrome?
www. pregnancybirthbaby.org.au/screening-down-syndrome
(November 15, 2013 at 2:15 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: ...How about this: Racism leads to eugenics.
Agreed.
And speciesism.


