Replacing Religious Morality

[Bipolar Bob]

I already defended my view of it in the post above yours.

What you have not defended is moral facts, if you are going to state that there is an objective moral standard then you have show us what are the properties of right and wrong, good or evil, you have to show us how those properties could be measured and observed and by what means they can be measured or observed.

If something has no measurable properties and you cannot observe it then its status as a fact becomes iffy to say the least.



*edited because I am damn dsylexci...I mean dyslexic