Question on the Validity of Jesus

[Esquilax]

He's just going to say that Jesus' crucifixion extended to past sins as well, and point out that the Bible says that Abraham is in heaven. Then I would come in and say that since Abraham was almost certainly a polytheist and didn't know about the requirement of accepting the Jesus as his redeeming lord and savior to get into heaven, so clearly Drich isn't being coherent since Abraham couldn't have conceivably accepted Jesus' sacrifice that he couldn't have known about, otherwise he would have ensured that each of his descendants didn't bother with the Mosaic Law and just focus on the salvation through Jesus aspect.
Then Drich will pull some turd out of his ass by entirely quoting things out of context - from his own Holy scriptures, no less! - and then I'll get pissed, Min will jump in and it will just be a clusterfuck.


You see, that's a much better prophecy than any Biblical one.

And the moment he does that, I'll safely and happily assume that salvation is temporal, and not based on acceptance of christ at all, because the requirements for attaining heaven will become: "Except for situations in which accepting Jesus' sacrifice is not required, accepting Jesus' sacrifice is required to attain salvation."