Far-right rioters leave trail of destruction in Polish capital

[kılıç_mehmet]

The majority was terrified and cowed by the Fascists in Italy and Germany in 1940's. The Night of Long Knives, for example, took out both Nazi and opponents.

Why do I feel you'd defend such an event as "the majority is getting tired of this. You'll see more and more incidents like this one in the future. "

It was the majority who supported the Fascists in Italy and the Nazis in Germany, similarly, the nationalists in Turkey.
And you cannot intimidate the majority for too long, as today's events show, and if the Fascists and Nazis had no means of public support, they would not have been able to stay in power for too long as to wage war, nor increase their potential.
Similarly, if the majority did not support the nationalist revolution in Turkey, Turkey wouldn't exist.
In essence, all the leaders meant to do the same thing: Come to power, use the power to fuel national interests and create a strong national identity and commitment to national goals.
Some failed, some like us, succeeded.

Perhaps the problem isn't immigration in general, but rather that much of the immigration comes from your part of the world, where science and morality are both stuck in reverse.

Perhaps the solution is to kick out people like you and let you ruin your own civilizations, as you have done an amazing job of doing, instead of ruining theirs.

I am stunned by the hypocrisy of your post. You come here and tell me that immigrants "from my part of the world" are problematic(and they are, for they live in a place that is completely foreign to their character, came there with nothing to show for, and therefore, can only work in low-wage jobs), while chastisizing those (those who are anti-immigration) who claim that immigrants are problematic, with racism and xenophobia. I wonder if you could say the same for the immigrants in the US, or your own ethnic minorities, the Blacks. Why not send them back to where they came from? Their presence contributes to crime and siphons off of your taxes. Just tell them to do the same. But I personally believe that liberals are the foremost reasons for their poverty. Besides, the immigrants do not ruin the culture on their own. Liberals do. And they do this by bringing the said people into their own countries, and proclaiming that now the native culture be treated on the same level as the foreign culture they had brought in. This slowly but surely undermines and distorts the domestic culture and traditions, while foreign traditions are especially protected under the wings of liberals, which is archived by granting them special "privilages" and special rights that are above the rights of the majority, as they enjoy protection, while the domestic culture and traditions are proclaimed to be "outdated" and "oppressive to minorities".

Well, I for one do not wish my people to go to Europe, really. They are being used as the tools of the liberals in their schemes, to create a battleground for cultures, by putting people of different cultures under the same roof. Liberalism maintains that this is possible under the pretext of "multiculturalism".
We on the other hand do not insult a culture as bad and backwards, like you did just now. We just think that each culture maintains an area of influence where it can flourish without getting into fight with other cultures, peoples and religions.
Liberals are fools, and they engineered this for many of the countries of Europe. If there is such a culture war between natives and immigrants, its not the fault of the immigrants or the natives, but the liberals who claimed that a culturally homogenous Europe was bad thing. They lured my people to Germany with promises of higher wages, and they went, without having any property, roots, nor anything of value in that country, their lot in life could only be that of the lowly worker. Given this, why would they want to discard their own ways for the ways of foreigners? Their loyalty still lays with their homeland, naturally. But liberals do not ask for the loyalty of immigrants, just their presence, so that they can justify their position as "heroes of tolerance" and "savior of minorities".
Similarly, the liberals have told us that since we're all "brothers in humanity", we do not need to build cars, we do not need our own technology, we do not need to be anything else but a nation of farmers and cheap workers, and in turn, they'd provide us with technology, while we provide them with labor and food.
Liberalism is a plague upon every nation. It brings only more strife. And while it does this, it claims to have the moral upper ground.
It certainly doesn't.

The far-right are fucking scum, I hope they destroy Poland so the Poles can learn the dangers of nationalism, & I say thid as someone who hates multiculturalism.

Wow, the commie is mad, and goes wild with curses. Wherever nationalism is on the rise, commies cover in fear.

---

Just to show another example of how liberalism is the epitome of failure, I'll use my own country. Today, there exists a war of two ethnicities in Turkey. That of the Turks and the Kurds.
According to Liberals, these two people should be able to coexist. So how come that the minority vehemently denies our rule? Well, there is the thing, it is our rule, the rule of the Turks, because it was us who founded the country, and it was us, who made its laws. So liberalism yet again maintains that the minority takes up arms against us because we do not wish to include their identity and their culture into the "national culture" and "national identity"of the Turkish republic, who has been founded by Turks.
So liberalism yet again maintains that this could be archived by compromise, by that, each side giving up something in favor of peace. It requires that the current national identity be abolished and a new identity be created. But neither side is happy with this. Turks do not wish to relinquish their rights as the founders of the country, the Kurds do not wish to give up on their dreams of independence.
So we fight.
How do you propose that liberalism would create harmony without resulting into fighting? It can't. Liberalism only serves to anger both sides even more, creating more strife, and even perhaps, a civil war o major scale, while nationalism maintains order by power, not by hypocrisy. Whoever fights better and with more courage for their national interests, will triumph at the end. If we win, we will have subjugated them, and force them to accept our laws and ways, creating harmony, even though by power, if they win, they will cede from our lands, and claim the sweet prize of independence and national pride.
Liberalism contributes to nothing, as it maintains nothing.