RE: Omniscience Argument Revisited
November 22, 2013 at 5:11 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2013 at 5:12 pm by MindForgedManacle.)
You're not arguing against what I said. 
But the point is that if you cannot infer God's existence because he conforms to none of the concepts humans encapsulate in words, then he is a nonsensical concept. It's functionally equivalent to saying:
"There is something I can't describe that exists in a way I can't describe; I can't even really say it 'exists' because it is beyond what I can describe."
See why that just reduces theism to tatters?
But the point is that if you cannot infer God's existence because he conforms to none of the concepts humans encapsulate in words, then he is a nonsensical concept. It's functionally equivalent to saying:
"There is something I can't describe that exists in a way I can't describe; I can't even really say it 'exists' because it is beyond what I can describe."
See why that just reduces theism to tatters?
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
-George Carlin
