EvF Wrote:I consider the possibility of considering things without evidence, but I choose not to put it into practice.
Seems perfectly rational to me. Fr0d0, do you think it would be more rational if I considered the possibility of both believing with and without evidence and chose without evidence, chose "faith"? For no reason?
Because there IS a reason with evidence, because evidence itself is a reason - it's an indication in the truth of the matter. And the truth matters to me.
EvF