Atheists condone and condemn rape

[Michael Schubert]

One of the illogical things about atheists is their belief in relativity in everything. There is no absolutes in anything.

Some may believe killing is bad, others it's ok( evolutionary asserting your dominance)
Rape is bad, rape is ok( dominant mammal satisfying sexual desire)

In fact the latter of the two is most in line with atheists as they love to talk about evolutionary adaptations.

So why can't humans rape? Any atheists that condemn rape first of all are going against relativism and assuming there should absolutely be no rape. According to whom? According to whom should there be no rape?
The answer is clear, Allah prohibits rape. The penalty is death.

Atheists live in contradictions, relativity is the foundation of atheisms while many atheists are 'condemning' rape. Rape is jus another action relative to that individual. So it's illogical for atheists to condemn it.

Islam= Probibits rape
Atheists= rape is ok to some and bad to some

---

Atheist responses- it's bad. You can't force somebody.

Why not? Why is it 'bad'? What's wrong with a male spreading his genes through dominating a weaker individual. Survival of the fittest right? Why is it 'wrong'?

.....yawn.......

I'm not sure which logical fallacy this is....it sounds most like the Hasty Generalization. Licker of Allah's balls here is conflating atheists with those who accept evolution. More so, the original poster takes Darwin's theories out of context. Darwin's theory of Survival of the Fittest is simply a biological fact: species who cannot meet the demands of their external environment will die. What specific atheists condone rape? Notice there are no names given.

It's also rather hypocritical. Last I checked, it's the Middle-Eastern countries where women get raped if they don't wear veils, all in the name of Allah.