(December 11, 2013 at 5:12 am)daandaan Wrote:(December 11, 2013 at 4:54 am)GodsRevolt Wrote: Regarding the OP
You allow for continued development in scientific understanding, but when it comes to religion everything has to be exactly right from the start?
yes , becouse god is without faults ...so there should be no faults ..becouse even 1 fault would prove he doesnt exist ...en we ve found millions of faults..
No, I am saying that our understanding of God has been imperfect, just as our scientific understanding of the natural world has been imperfect. Both have developed.
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton