In defense of Drich, at least his arguments resemble reason and logic, and show signs of accepting the notion that one must reason from premises which are reasonably shared to be true by both sides. This douche bag just spews a diarrhea of pseudo-philosophical word salad, grounded in his stupid cunt of a book. It'd be like quoting the laws of Manu and other Hindu smriti to prove Platonism. It's just so full of fuck, this guy must have a permanent brown stain running down the center of his shirt from the perpetual river of drool.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)