RE: God is timeless
December 15, 2013 at 4:57 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2013 at 5:42 pm by WackyWicky.)
(December 4, 2013 at 11:10 am)enrico Wrote:Huh? What the hell did he just say, anyone have any idea? If I was a semanticist I'd paraphrase the above as "Blah, blah....".(December 4, 2013 at 9:54 am)FreeTony Wrote: If you really do understand what you are saying then answer me the following:
How do I test if something is timeless?
You can not be in London and Rome at the same time.
You and we humans are UNIdimensional not MULTIdimensional in nature but if we want to overcome this limitation then we will have to expand our consciousness.
It involve a lot of hard work and it also involve an open mind.
When you think that the life is finite and there is nothing outside this dimension and when you think that if God ever exist must be outside and not within then you start with the wrong foot and as i already said your chances to understand how the whole system works are zero.
There is not much difference between an atheist and a religious person.
Both of you are stuck in blind faith and dogma.
It will take a lot of time to find out what you are asking for but at the same time is all very very close to your life.
It is so close in fact that can not be any closer.
Search within with an open mind and you will find.![]()
(December 14, 2013 at 4:50 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote: I don't hear a rebuttal!
How about this:
God is timeless (first categorical statement [rebuts the second statement])
God is not timeless (second categorical statement [rebuts the first categorical statement])
The whole argument is moot: god isn't and time (some physicists suggest from theoretical mathematical testing) isn't.
If you put the second statement first and the first second then the first (second) would rebut the second (first). Fun, huh?



(December 3, 2013 at 9:50 am)FreeTony Wrote: "God is timeless" is something Christians spout all the time. Along with "God is both inside and outside time"
What does it even mean? Whenever I've asked for clarification none is given, they just expect you to accept this with no explanation. I'm coming at this with a background in physics.
Time is very difficult to understand and as far as I'm aware no one really does, though plenty of work is being done to establish it. It could well be that time is just an illusion.
I just don't understand what they can possibly mean. Anyone clear it up, or am I thinking about it in too much depth and it's just pseudo-scientific garbage with no meaning at all?
They gotcha, ya Doubting Thomas you are going to hell

The last sentence!