RE: Atheists condone and condemn rape
December 18, 2013 at 8:40 pm
(This post was last modified: December 18, 2013 at 8:41 pm by Mystical.)
(December 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm)Chas Wrote:(December 18, 2013 at 2:51 am)missluckie26 Wrote: Chas chas chas, chas cha chchas, chas cha chas cha chas!
Come back and tell me how I tossed my salad wrong!
By inflating the importance of inheritance via an epigenetic route.
Remember, only changes to germ cells can be inherited, not genetic or epigenetic changes to somatic cells.
Sorry Chas, I disagree.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.