RE: The Bible is the claim, not the evidence
December 19, 2013 at 4:44 am
(This post was last modified: December 19, 2013 at 4:45 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(December 18, 2013 at 8:24 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(December 18, 2013 at 4:33 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Citation.
EDIT: I see this is a lie that has been debunked already . Your evidence is dismissed as nonsense. Thanks for playing.
Calling this a lie is rather harsh, it’s just an older argument that creationists do not recommend using anymore (thus refuting the silly claim that creationism never progresses or changes).
http://creation.com/the-extinction-of-th...ick-freeze
"“Woolly mammoths were snap frozen during the Flood catastrophe.” This is contradicted by the geological setting in which mammoths are found. It’s most likely that they perished toward the end of the Ice Age, possibly in catastrophic dust storms. Partially digested stomach contents are not proof of a snap freeze, because the elephant’s stomach functions as a holding area—a mastodon with preserved stomach contents was found in mid-western USA, where the ground was not frozen."- Creation.com[/size][/size][/size]
Hi Stat, long time no speak. Hope you're well.
Anyway, the [creation] thesis regarding these mammoths has been debunked. The fact that orangebox
Used it to support his theory kind of lends weight to the notion he was being disingenuous, or somewhat ignorant, or both.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.