Is Obama guilty of war crimes?

[Blake the Heretic]

The Yemen government and the drone strikes...you don't remember the very last thing you said to me? 0.o

Of course he was 'in on it'. he requested US aid.

The economist? Why would I go to an economic journal to find out information on foreign policy. I mean I guess it does effect the market in ways, but you'd think we'd have a journal dedicated to military drills/operations/and actions?

(Facepalms) The economist covers worldwide politics.

Not the government, the drone strikes. It feels shady. I get the sense that there is more to the story, just like Iraq turned out to be a shady war.

right your secret spidey sense trumps anything else. I'm convinced.

I don't perceive the Talaban as some great threat.

Possibly because teven if they do retake afganistan they are unlikley to attack the USA again.

I think we can defend ourselves well enough. We've not been attacked since 9/11 and surely we can learn our lesson from it to avoid further incidents.

What lesson is that?

War doesn't really solve anything...if you haven't noticed each war we have just leaves us with more problems that it solves. World War II lead us to nuclear weapons and the Cold War, a/quote]

Yes that World war II. We should have just let Hitler to dominate Europe and Japan to enslave Asia. Much better for everyone. The cold war stayed cold and no nuclear weapons, post WW2 were ever used.
[quote]
And our War in Iraq and Afghanistan has left us with a series of people in the Middle East who don't like us all too much.

So how come you were attacked by Al Qaida BEFORE the invasion of Iraq and Afganistan?CVlinton didn't have an aggressive policy vis a v the middle east.

I think after a long history of bloodshed, the world could at least start making an effort towards peace instead of going straight to bombs and military action.

Yes why not stat a talking shop where all nations could discuss things. We could call it the 'United Nations' or somesuch.

Yes because forcing Syria to get rid of its Chemical weapons is such a terrible way of stopping Syria from using chemical weapons -.-'

What is your point here?

That sucks for them. It's a three-sided war, and the people aren't doing too well.

Well that is at least true.

Do not give me crap for thinking a journal/magazine/news source named 'The Economist' was about economics. it literally says 'Economic' right in its name -.-' I'm not familiar with this particular political information source.

Never said you had to accept it off my magic spidey sense, I was just saying that to me personally I get a negative impression.

What lesson? Well how about 'Take Threats Seriously' or does no one else remember how lack of preparedness and unwillingness to address a potential threat is what allowed 9/11 to happen in the first place?

I knew Clinton had the opportunity to kill either Bin Laden or Hussein when he was still in office ( I can't remember which of the two specifically it was ) I know nothing of Al Quada attacking during his administration though.

Nice, sarcasm.

My point was there was a diplomatic solution in Syria, but Obama wanted there to be war.

Well we agree on a whopping 1 thing lol