RE: Is Obama guilty of war crimes?
December 26, 2013 at 2:01 pm
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2013 at 2:03 pm by là bạn điên.)
Quote:Do not give me crap for thinking a journal/magazine/news source named 'The Economist' was about economics. it literally says 'Economic' right in its name -.-' I'm not familiar with this particular political information source.
It is the third highest selling political magazine in the USA.
Quote:Never said you had to accept it off my magic spidey sense, I was just saying that to me personally I get a negative impression.
You don't read much or research at all on the matter so what is your impression based on?
Quote:What lesson? Well how about 'Take Threats Seriously' or does no one else remember how lack of preparedness and unwillingness to address a potential threat is what allowed 9/11 to happen in the first place?
There are hundreds of potential threats daily
Quote:I knew Clinton had the opportunity to kill either Bin Laden or Hussein when he was still in office ( I can't remember which of the two specifically it was ) I know nothing of Al Quada attacking during his administration though.
Why don't you know these things? You are very opinionated and yet don;t seem to bother about reading stuff up.
AQ attacked the USA in Bush's first year, well before he enacted any strongMiddle Eastern Policy. The Invasions were a result of that. Radicals seem to imply that the 9/11 attacks were a result of the USA attacking Afghanistan.
Quote:Nice, sarcasm.
Glad it makes you happy
Quote:My point was there was a diplomatic solution in Syria, but Obama wanted there to be war.
There has been no diplomatic solution. Syria is in a bloody civil war with hundreds of thousands dead, the vast majority of whom were killed by conventional means. This killing is still going on. All that has been removed was a vastly smaller number of deaths from poison gas. If that is a 'solution' to the war then you have some strange ideas.