Morality would be arbitrary if it was only dependent on Gods orders, because if we consider the possibility of him not existing, what we consider good isn't intrinsically good. But even with the understanding that bad things are bad without needing Gods orders shows that we can determine what's right and what's wrong ourselves. Why then do we need God to be good?
Morality can be achieved secularly. There's not one religious morality that cannot be achieved by secular means.
This dilemma shows that either way, morality is an entity more superior to God, and does not depend on him whatsoever.
Did I understand that concept right?
Morality can be achieved secularly. There's not one religious morality that cannot be achieved by secular means.
This dilemma shows that either way, morality is an entity more superior to God, and does not depend on him whatsoever.
Did I understand that concept right?