(January 2, 2014 at 6:18 am)paulpablo Wrote: Knowing something happened after it happened isn't a miracle.
But here's a response to the claim anyway.
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses...joseph.htm
In general you are right. But you have to keep in mind that more than a 1000 years after the first egyptian ruler applied "pr-aa" as one of his titles, the quran was written. So there is actually no possible way that muhammad could have known of this differences.
I have read this response, it is very bad imo.
I also believe that mohammed actually thought that "firawn" is the name of that dude and not a title for a ruler. I think the bible commits the same fallacy.
