(January 3, 2014 at 7:44 am)The.question Wrote:(January 2, 2014 at 6:18 am)paulpablo Wrote: Knowing something happened after it happened isn't a miracle.
But here's a response to the claim anyway.
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses...joseph.htm
In general you are right. But you have to keep in mind that more than a 1000 years after the first egyptian ruler applied "pr-aa" as one of his titles, the quran was written. So there is actually no possible way that muhammad could have known of this differences.
I have read this response, it is very bad imo.
I also believe that mohammed actually thought that "firawn" is the name of that dude and not a title for a ruler. I think the bible commits the same fallacy.
You are here now 3000 years after the Egyptians first called their rulers pharaoh and you know the difference.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
