RE: "Gödel's ontological proof" proves existence of God
January 11, 2014 at 12:17 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2014 at 12:17 am by MindForgedManacle.)
We actually already had a thread over this in the Religion forum back when it was first unveiled. I think Rasetsu hit the undeniable flaw in that type of argument. And as far as I can remember, wasn't the conclusion that the argument as valid, not sound? I'm not sure whether it's even possible (currently) for programming logic (which is underpinned by mathematics) to evaluate an argument for conceptual and/or semantic soundness. Or maybe I'm just ignorant.
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
-George Carlin