(January 14, 2014 at 8:22 pm)Waratah Wrote:(January 14, 2014 at 8:13 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: No, the first was a clear violation - and is often enough to justify a ban. It depends on the circumstances. If it was a clear hit-and-run post, it would have been. The second made it instaban-worthy.Why was the first post a clear violation of the spamming rule?
I would agree that it is rarely necessary or relavent to investigate outside activity. In a case where a member reports that they've seen an apparent copy-pasta elsewhere, yes we're going to at least look into it, if only to add additional confirmation to what we already have learned.
Because it contained, in addition to the text of the post, a link to where the product described could be purchased. In *most* cases, we instaban people who do this on first post.