I need a volunteer

[Cyberman]

I'm a zombie with over three years membership who just so happens to have racked up nearly nine thousand posts with a kudos ratio of 2.25, a reputation rating forty-three times yours and regarded well enough by the community to have been offered a Staff position. Misrepresenting my character in an attempt to discredit my words - an ad hominem attack - only results in judgement being drawn about your own.

You are very funny Stimbo.
Go in a Theist forum and see how many kudos you will get.
Sometime ago i have been in the catholic forum.
I lasted just over one month before they kicked me out.
Don't you think it is natural to be welcome in a forum in which you agree with their policy?

I will not be deflected by your red herrings, except inasmuch to deliver the following for your education: if I make no comment about another member's post when I am addressing yours, the intellectually honest position is to form no opinion at all about my motives. That you have chosen to do the opposite is most revealing.

You can do whatever you like but this is not the real spirit of a forum in which there suppose to exist an exchange of ideas all around.
I always try my best to answer to everybody unless i agree with what they say.

Or they ask you anything pertaining to what you assert. You still haven't approached anything like an answer to the question of who these alleged eyewitnesses to JC were. In fact you're running ever closer to a breach of Forum Rule #1.

]No, you stated that there were many such witnesses, without offering any further details. I asked you to name some of them. Why is this so hard for you to get through your skull? Could it be (gasp; horror) that you have nothing more to offer than bald and baseless assertions in a futile attempt to appear learned?

I already answered this question telling you that i believe in what is written in the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ.
If you don't believe in what is written you are free to provide evidence that this book say bullshit.
I follow logic and what is written in this book follow logic.

Logic doesn't prove anything. Logic simply organises whatever data you feed into it; if you feed bullshit in, you get bullshit out. Name the names or concede that you have nothing of substance.

How can you justify claiming that these early xtians wouldn't have suffered and died (evidence for which is nonexistent anyway) unless Jesus was a tremendous spiritual teacher? What about the 9/11 hijackers? Would they have died for a lie?

Where is the evidence that there were hijackers?

Are you seriously claiming there weren't any hijackers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ay3w2ijwws

Regardless, those aeroplanes were diverted into the World Trade Centre. The simplest explanation is that they were hijacked - a fact confirmed by telephone calls made by passengers and crew on those doomed flights, viz:

(Warning: potentially disturbing material.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Tr0u35Tek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYBhgEm3j7A

Now give your evidence for eyewitnesses to JC's 'miracles' that is at least equal to that.

On the contrary there is evidence that 3 Israeli agents were watching with the binoculars the twin towers and as soon as the planes hit the towers they jump up in the air in joy.

Then present it here for discussion, as I did above. Or retract it if you can't for whatever reason.

I could supply testimonials that penis enlargers and Nigerian princes are genuine. In order for anyone to take them seriously, first you need to demonstrate that they are credible and even then there has to be independent corroborating evidence; particularly when the only reference to these witnesses is one brief passage in one source book of highly dubious credibility.

Of course.
Everything that does not go along with your believes is highly dubious.
What's new Stimbo!

Another ad hom. Address the points or I shall report you for violation of Forum Rule #1.