(February 4, 2014 at 7:48 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Where did I say any of this? I just thought it was funny that you were blabbering on about science but the only one in this debate who has an actual science education is the creationist. Funny old world isn’t it?If you find red herrings to be humorous, even after being told they're irrelevant, I guess so.
Quote:Science deals with induction, math and logic deal with proof. I realize I have told you this before…I'm pretty sure you're wrong but even if you're right, irrelevant. The word "prove" in this context is in an argumentative sense. It was in the same sense as used in that "A Few Good Men" scene I once referred you to:
"It doesn't matter what I believe. It only matters what I can prove."
It was a great movie until the very end when the movie asked me to believe that Tom Cruise could make Jack Nickleson break on the stand.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
