RE: BILL NYE VS KEN HAM: TONIGHT AT 7 PM
February 7, 2014 at 7:03 am
(This post was last modified: February 7, 2014 at 7:06 am by Zen Badger.)
(February 6, 2014 at 8:53 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(February 5, 2014 at 9:02 am)Zen Badger Wrote: I got the impression that the debate was secondary to Nye's main objective. Which was to push the value of objective science to the Christian audience. But at least some of them would have finally gotten a view of evolution and the universe undistorted by the lies of the likes of Ham, Hovind et al.
What do you mean by objective science?
You know, where real scientists base their conclusions on the evidence.
As opposed to creation"science" where the evidence is twisted, distorted and generally fucked up by mentally diminutive cretinist morons who've had their chromosomes painted on in order to conform to a Stone Age fairy tale written by goat fucking savages that thought bats were birds. So that they can attempt to give credence to their delusion that the creator of the infinite universe is their special friend.(and incidentally, fleece the gullible masses of even more money in the process)
That objective science.
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.