RE: Religious View: Atheism?
March 15, 2010 at 9:48 am
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2010 at 9:51 am by Violet.)
(March 14, 2010 at 8:24 pm)Arminius Wrote: omfg, this is just a place for self-appointed high ground sitters to sit in ambush for the unwary.Clearly. After all... only the most ninja could ambush from a hilltop.
Quote:What a bunch of self-interested wankers, not athiests, but wankers with an athiest banner, shame on you for being so shallow and weak-minded!Why can't 'shallow and weak-minded wankers' be atheists? I'm afraid I don't follow.
Quote:Oh and the banning may as well include me, because sitting here having an intellectual wank with you lot is probably the singly most unatractive thing for me to want to do ever.Why would an admin waste their time banning you? Of course, if you come back and troll, then you might be banned. If you come back and join in rational discussion with the 'intellectual wankers' here... then why would you be banned?
If it is so unattractive... then why did you write a "farewell" post? It does not compute...
Quote:At least I don't feel the so needy as to do this for a passtime, cunts!
Well thank your lucky stars... there's reason to direct you to a psychologist otherwise. Does anyone else find it odd that he continually refers to body parts he does not posses? Wanking implies that he has a biological 'device' by which masturbation is possible... which I believe declaring him lacking said 'device' would be the proper insult at this juncture?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
