Sword,
I haven't responded to your last few posts as there are just too many assumptions and flat unsupported statements to deal with in a single post.
That having been said here are a few things to contemplate:
1. The universe appears to be almost entirely life prohibiting at the moment. There is no evidence of life anywhere other than on this planet and as a proportion of the whole that is a tiny percentage. I'd guess something in the region of 10^(-25)% of the whole.
2.The improbability of life appears to be supported in 1, above. If this is the only place in the universe with life on it then we are looking for a very improbable set of factors being in place for it to form.
3. The argument that the universe is fine tuned for life seems to be massively less likely than life adapting to the universe in which it finds itself, when possible. As in 2 and 3 above that happens exceedingly rarely.
4. We have no idea if a different universe with different properties could sustain life - particularly at the tiny rates this universe appears to. That life may be unrecognisable to us but still able to ask the question "what are the odds of our universe exiting?"
5. We can't make any statements as to what life in a different universe might require. It may be working with a different number of dimensions and different laws of physics.
6. Even if you could argue that the universe was designed to support life you are still a long way from showing it was designed for us. We could still be a byproduct ina universe designed to support single cellular organisms.
7. Nothing you have stated to date is anything other than cherry-picking bits on the outlying edges of scientific hypotheisis. There simply isn't a shred of evidence for any of it beyond distorted philosophical ideas.
I haven't responded to your last few posts as there are just too many assumptions and flat unsupported statements to deal with in a single post.
That having been said here are a few things to contemplate:
1. The universe appears to be almost entirely life prohibiting at the moment. There is no evidence of life anywhere other than on this planet and as a proportion of the whole that is a tiny percentage. I'd guess something in the region of 10^(-25)% of the whole.
2.The improbability of life appears to be supported in 1, above. If this is the only place in the universe with life on it then we are looking for a very improbable set of factors being in place for it to form.
3. The argument that the universe is fine tuned for life seems to be massively less likely than life adapting to the universe in which it finds itself, when possible. As in 2 and 3 above that happens exceedingly rarely.
4. We have no idea if a different universe with different properties could sustain life - particularly at the tiny rates this universe appears to. That life may be unrecognisable to us but still able to ask the question "what are the odds of our universe exiting?"
5. We can't make any statements as to what life in a different universe might require. It may be working with a different number of dimensions and different laws of physics.
6. Even if you could argue that the universe was designed to support life you are still a long way from showing it was designed for us. We could still be a byproduct ina universe designed to support single cellular organisms.
7. Nothing you have stated to date is anything other than cherry-picking bits on the outlying edges of scientific hypotheisis. There simply isn't a shred of evidence for any of it beyond distorted philosophical ideas.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
