Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 23, 2025, 12:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science And The Bible - Introduction
#81
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction
(December 13, 2008 at 8:52 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:
(December 13, 2008 at 8:49 pm)Daystar Wrote: If you are criticizing the Bible the burden of proof is on you. You can dismiss the Bible with or without evidence, obviously you know this, but if you publicly criticize it the burden is upon you. You fail in this.
No, thats not how the burden of proof works. The has to be actual evidence of the truth of the bible before I have to disprove it. And if any believer, such as yourself, claims its truth then the burden is on you. The default position is non-truth until any evidence for truth is shown. IF the bible then really does show evidence of its truth (and it never has so far and I don't see how it could really), THEN the burden of proof moves to me. And the atheists. Until then the burden of proof is on you and the bible. The burden of proof is on the believer.
By your logic then that means you have to disprove the flying spaghetti monster rather than a believer in the FSM to have to prove it?
And that the burden of proof is on you to disprove the 'truth' of the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Keeping mind that I have explained to you that I am not at all interested in proving anything to you, your science etc. It isn't my burden it is yours.

Keeping that in mind. If I showed you tons of examples where the Bible was proven right by science and archaeology that would impress you to what degree? Not that I think it would be important, just out of curiosity.

And just going over what you said, for fun -

1. There has to be actual evidence of the truth of the Bible before you have to disprove it. In other words you are just this hapless guy floating around in the universe and criticizing the Bible which you have never read. That is science and that is evidence.

So if you decided to criticize Newton’s theory of gravity you wouldn’t have to know it at all and it would be up to Newton’s work Principia or those who believe in it to challenge it. The burden of proof would be upon them.

2. The default position is non-proof. Never mind that either the Bible or Principia had already made their position of truth known you were just too lazy or indoctrinated with your own thing to have bothered with it. I have to show you.

3. So . . . Until the Atheists such as yourself actually get around to doing anything other than making baseless claims of complete ignorance about the Bible and their own disbelief regarding said works it is up to me to ‘prove’ their respective truths to you, who are not going to believe anything I say because it doesn’t fit in with their lobotomized and similar unproven theory of evolution which you also know almost next to nothing about.

Wouldn’t it be easier, EVF, for you to prove evolution to me? That is now my challenge to you. The burden of proof is upon you and oh, I know you won’t take that lightly!

Well … c’mon, then! Lets see you!

Lets save the FSM for later adventures for now.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 3:44 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 4, 2008 at 3:54 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by CoxRox - December 4, 2008 at 4:35 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 4:45 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 5:54 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 6:04 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Kyuuketsuki - December 4, 2008 at 6:10 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 10:55 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Kyuuketsuki - December 5, 2008 at 4:50 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 5, 2008 at 11:48 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 5, 2008 at 4:55 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 5, 2008 at 5:20 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 6, 2008 at 8:02 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 6, 2008 at 8:03 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 6:13 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 5:20 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Darwinian - December 4, 2008 at 3:58 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 4:04 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 6:08 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 4, 2008 at 6:13 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 6:20 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 4, 2008 at 6:27 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 6:32 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 4, 2008 at 4:46 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 5:25 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 4, 2008 at 6:07 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 4, 2008 at 6:30 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 4, 2008 at 6:34 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by CoxRox - December 4, 2008 at 6:41 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 6:46 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 4, 2008 at 6:48 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by CoxRox - December 4, 2008 at 6:55 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 4, 2008 at 7:04 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 4, 2008 at 7:09 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 4, 2008 at 7:51 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by CoxRox - December 4, 2008 at 7:10 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 4, 2008 at 7:55 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 4, 2008 at 7:17 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 4, 2008 at 8:03 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 5, 2008 at 5:55 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Tiberius - December 5, 2008 at 4:42 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 5, 2008 at 6:14 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 6, 2008 at 12:19 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LukeMC - December 6, 2008 at 12:27 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 6, 2008 at 3:35 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Ace Otana - December 6, 2008 at 4:17 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 6, 2008 at 9:59 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 9, 2008 at 3:05 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 9, 2008 at 9:05 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 9, 2008 at 11:39 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 10, 2008 at 1:01 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 5, 2008 at 9:07 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 6, 2008 at 12:28 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 6, 2008 at 5:16 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Ace Otana - December 6, 2008 at 12:21 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Tiberius - December 9, 2008 at 10:29 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Kyuuketsuki - December 12, 2008 at 6:36 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Kyuuketsuki - December 14, 2008 at 8:14 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by DD_8630 - January 7, 2009 at 9:06 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 9, 2008 at 10:31 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 10, 2008 at 12:38 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 10, 2008 at 11:47 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 11, 2008 at 12:50 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 13, 2008 at 8:49 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 13, 2008 at 8:52 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 13, 2008 at 11:57 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 1:25 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 10, 2008 at 12:04 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Tiberius - December 10, 2008 at 12:18 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 10, 2008 at 12:18 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 11, 2008 at 12:07 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by allan175 - December 11, 2008 at 5:54 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 13, 2008 at 9:13 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by allan175 - December 14, 2008 at 7:13 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Purple Rabbit - December 14, 2008 at 7:44 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by allan175 - December 14, 2008 at 7:55 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Kyuuketsuki - December 11, 2008 at 7:25 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 11, 2008 at 12:00 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 11, 2008 at 5:32 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Purple Rabbit - December 11, 2008 at 7:28 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by leo-rcc - December 11, 2008 at 2:42 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 12, 2008 at 12:25 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Purple Rabbit - December 12, 2008 at 9:22 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - December 12, 2008 at 1:06 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Rob - December 13, 2008 at 9:23 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Daystar - December 13, 2008 at 10:20 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Tiberius - December 13, 2008 at 9:56 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Darwinian - December 14, 2008 at 5:38 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Darwinian - December 14, 2008 at 8:05 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Tiberius - December 14, 2008 at 9:49 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 9:54 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by LondonLoves - January 26, 2009 at 1:31 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by Giff - January 27, 2009 at 5:32 am
RE: Science And The Bible - Introduction - by lukec - January 26, 2009 at 3:49 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Science and Theism Doesn't Work out right? Hellomate1234 28 2010 November 7, 2024 at 8:12 am
Last Post: syntheticadrenaline
  Do you think Science and Religion can co-exist in a society? ErGingerbreadMandude 137 44101 June 10, 2017 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: comet
  Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! Whateverist 123 41643 May 15, 2017 at 9:05 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Why Science and religious faith are in conflict. Jehanne 28 8803 May 1, 2017 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Science and Religion not in direct conflict? maestroanth 26 6311 December 31, 2015 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  On Unbelief I. Introduction Mudhammam 7 3136 December 11, 2014 at 12:54 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! Duke Guilmon 8 3747 April 27, 2014 at 6:53 pm
Last Post: MJ the Skeptical
  Can Science and religion co-exist? Manowar 42 10697 March 30, 2014 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: ManMachine
  Science and Religion Tortino 35 9180 October 4, 2013 at 9:37 pm
Last Post: Ryantology
  Would you be an atheist if science and reason wasn't supportive of atheism? Vincenzo Vinny G. 151 68880 December 9, 2012 at 4:27 pm
Last Post: Samson1



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)