A god that is made of anything can be affected by some thing, even if not matter. The only god that can be omnipotent on that score then is one that isn't composed of something, or in other words, one that doesn't exist. I think all you've managed to prove, by definition, is that an omnipotent god cannot exist. Why your definition is presumed to be correct, I don't know. It seems counterproductive.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 7, 2024, 8:37 pm
Thread Rating:
The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic
|
A god that is made of anything can be affected by some thing, even if not matter. The only god that can be omnipotent on that score then is one that isn't composed of something, or in other words, one that doesn't exist. I think all you've managed to prove, by definition, is that an omnipotent god cannot exist. Why your definition is presumed to be correct, I don't know. It seems counterproductive. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)