The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic

[Angrboda]

You know that for a fact, do you. Where's your Nobel prize?

You don't know shit.

it's been known for quite some time. why don't you look up what a priori is, perhaps what Kant has to say on the subject.

You're suggesting that something can't come from nothing is an a priori truth and therefore a fact?

While you're brushing up on your Kant, refresh your memory on the relationship between a priori truths and hypothetical analytical truths like the bullshit you've been spewing.

Then brush up on the relationship between analytical truths and a posteriori truths, such as your assertion about the behavior of "nothing."

Like I said, you don't know shit.