The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic

[StuW]

I'll just leave this here...
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_geometry

perhaps you should relearn the definition of triangle...

Triangle- A closed figure consisting of three line segments linked end-to-end. A 3-sided polygon.
http://www.mathopenref.com/triangle.html

Polygon- A number of coplanar line segments, each connected end to end to form a closed shape.
http://www.mathopenref.com/polygon.html

that "triangle" as you call it certainly is not comprised of coplanar line segments... and you can even tell the lines aren't strait yet you seriously think it's a triangle? it resembles a triangle, which is why they call it one, but it is not a triangle.

Maybe you should re-read the definition of coplanar

In geometry, a set of points in space is coplanar if all the points lie in the same geometric plane. For example, three distinct points are always coplanar; but a fourth point or more added in space can exist in another plane, or, incoplanarly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coplanarity