Pet peeves?

[MJ the Skeptical]

I'm not arguing that because cigs are taxed = awesome

Why bring that up then? it's not a convincing argument to me.

or not everyone can smoke weed therefore they can smoke cigs

Then why compare the two? Weed most certainly can be used as a substitute smoking method for nicotine because at least THC is appealing, much more so than Nicotine and can overpower it.

But this whole "some people can't smoke weed" argument is a bad because I never said I want everyone to smoke weed, just everyone who smokes cigs, if they must smoke something.

What I am saying is - it's not super fucking simple like you make it out to be, which is not a justification for cigs being legal but it IS why people do not simply just fucking stop.

I never claimed it was simple to get cigarettes out of society. I was saying the concepts I was bringing up were simple. This is an equivocation. And, people can "just stop" but that's for those with strong willpower, not all of us have that, I agree.

Yes, weed tax could replace cig tax. Fine.

Great, then there is no logical argument for keeping cigarettes legal if we could hypothetically get rid of them tomorrow, for example.

And yes I am aware that pot's illegal status keeps many people from smoking it, but you do realize that it's much easier to attain when you can just walk into a store and buy it, right?

Which is a great argument for prohibition of cigs, thanks

Dealers can be such a hassle. So yeah, go ahead and misconstrue my arguments. You're not doing anything for anyone.

Well if I have I apologize but I don't agree, I think you're the only one who's misconstrued anything. Well, you don't need a dealer; there's plenty of decriminalized states you can get a prescription for it, two states where it's completely legal, and a bunch of other states where you can grow your own pot legally. Again, I don't see how the convenience of something makes your case, whatever your case is, you just seem to be butthurt about me being Anti-Cigarette