RE: Completely skipped this section.
February 19, 2014 at 10:14 pm
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2014 at 10:18 pm by MJ the Skeptical.)
(February 19, 2014 at 8:10 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The theologies burden of proof is fully met.
And it's pertinent in the current era.
You still haven't produced any non scientific claims for us to check out this claim your making.
As your dismissal appears to be grounded on science, I must conclude that you've been barking up the wrong tree.
The theology proves itself huh? Circular reasoning isn't meeting the burden of proof. Sorry pal.
I made no positive claim (if you even know what that is). You theists are the ones with the claims that you shift the burden of proof onto those who don't buy into your unproven, unscientific notions of an intelligence that didn't need to be created itself.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
