RE: Completely skipped this section.
February 21, 2014 at 12:48 am
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2014 at 12:58 am by Whateverist.)
(February 20, 2014 at 9:44 am)Quantum Theorist Wrote:(February 20, 2014 at 1:02 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Yet still you can't tell me what the claim is?
You can't accuse me of circular reasoning until I produce a reason that is circular. If you're going to make my argument for me then that's a sure way to win
Excuse me, but you said the theologies burden of proof has been met, when it clearly hasn't. That is circular reasoning and begging the question.
Frodo you do seem to be vacillating between speaking for all theists vs all atheists in terms of who has the burden of proof -and then- turning it personal and asking exactly what claim you yourself have made which has a burden of proof.
Everyone here can think of any number of theists who've made claims such as that the world only appears old, that morality is nonsense without a supernatural bad-ass to ensure consequences, and so on. So whether or not you've made any such claims, your more careful claims cannot shield the many crazies from the burden of proof.
Oops, where are my manners? Welcome Quantum Man! May you have many enjoyable moments here at AF!
