RE: Completely skipped this section.
February 21, 2014 at 3:39 am
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2014 at 3:59 am by fr0d0.)
(February 21, 2014 at 12:11 am)thesummerqueen Wrote:(February 20, 2014 at 6:07 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: He is an atheotard incapable of learning.
Mind your manners.
If you look you'll see I was called a creotard first. I'm not saying that makes me right, but it does display a certain blinkered vision.
A apart from this retaliation I have remained civil in this conversation, unlike the op.
Whateverist: I was mistakenly accused of reflecting back the burden of proof, as I explained in my last post above. I playfully went along with the accusation and did qualify it.
The op made the sweeping statement about all religions, not me. If the statement doesn't apply to me (and many other Christians), then am I not entitled to point that out?
Besides, atheotard seems to be a pretty accurate description for this person. Unlike his insults directed at me which he makes without knowing my stance on anything he's said about me.
Although I may be wrong... a wild and inaccurate insult isn't an insult at all, where an insult well aimed is actually something. I retract.
