RE: Completely skipped this section.
February 21, 2014 at 11:38 am
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2014 at 11:43 am by fr0d0.)
So again I ask, although I have already given up on this pointless task, truth be told....
What is the positive claim that I'm making?
I don't claim that God exists. I, and anyone else without supernatural abilities, can do no more than believe in him. That's all I claim as a fully signed up mainstream Christian: to believe in God.
I'm not about to point out to you the material evidence for the undetectable space ship on the lawn in front of me. There a simple clue in the problem: undetectable. You, as a pseudo scientist think that the laws of logic don't apply to you. So where it's the burden?
Are you not claiming that I claim that God exists? And if you are, do you not own that burden? Shouldn't you actually have to show that i make that claim? Do I have my logic backwards here?
Ignorance isn't an insult, it's an opportunity for learning. If you don't wish to learn, that's great. But own your ignorance.
What is the positive claim that I'm making?
I don't claim that God exists. I, and anyone else without supernatural abilities, can do no more than believe in him. That's all I claim as a fully signed up mainstream Christian: to believe in God.
I'm not about to point out to you the material evidence for the undetectable space ship on the lawn in front of me. There a simple clue in the problem: undetectable. You, as a pseudo scientist think that the laws of logic don't apply to you. So where it's the burden?
Are you not claiming that I claim that God exists? And if you are, do you not own that burden? Shouldn't you actually have to show that i make that claim? Do I have my logic backwards here?
Ignorance isn't an insult, it's an opportunity for learning. If you don't wish to learn, that's great. But own your ignorance.
